[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-voip
Subject:    Re: [cisco-voip] IPCCX 3.5 & 4.0: G.711 or G.729
From:       pwalenta () wi ! rr ! com
Date:       2006-02-28 13:45:12
Message-ID: fdd888e0e13.e13fdd888e0 () rdc-kc ! rr ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

The only real benefit in my mind is that everything is g.729 compressed
audio from the get-go.

I consider it a far better thing to build it g.711 and use transcoders
as I didn't think the g.729 coming right from CRS sounded that good.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mladen Milanoviæ <mmilanov@sezampro.yu>
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:42 am
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCCX 3.5 & 4.0: G.711 or G.729
To: cisco-usergroup-ipccexpress@yahoogroups.com, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

<P>Hi Group,</P>
<P>as you know CRS may be instaled as a G.711 or G.729 system. Until now
I have experiance only with G.711 installation.</P>
<P>I have several questions:</P>
<P>1. What is the benefit of G.729 CRS installation ?</P>
<P>2. What is the drawbacks if any ?</P>
<P>3. Did anyone have some experiances with this deploymet ?</P>
<P>4. What is a scenario where G.729 should be deployed ?</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Thanks.</P>
<P>Mladen</P>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]