[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)
From:       Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <bengelly () gmail ! com>
Date:       2019-01-28 7:19:44
Message-ID: C8AC0D3A-8FF0-4DE3-ADC5-35A386AA3E7E () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

You are absolutely right.

Worked quite extensively with those as RR / small MPLS-PE for colos, They were more \
than OJ.

For an entry-level box, it will perform all basic IP/MPLS stuff with very decent \
performance in an interesting form factor.

Maybe its' little brother, CES would perform better but never tested it myself and \
certainely not for FTTH deployments/needs.

In any case, those boxes were interesting back in the days like you pointed out. Too \
bad Brocade didn't invest more in them.

BR.



> Le 28 janv. 2019 à 07:51, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> > On 28/Jan/19 08:40, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Extreme (ex-Brocade) CER-RT
> 
> The NetIron CES/CER 2000 boxes were certainly worthy competitors back in
> 2009 - 2011. But I felt like they stopped getting developed after that,
> and while I considered them for FTTH services several years ago, I don't
> get the impression Brocade/Extreme have developed the box for the
> demands of 2019.
> 
> Of course, I could be totally wrong and someone is having very good
> success with it.
> 
> Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]