[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    [c-nsp] VB:  ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)
From:       <g () va-dumt ! se>
Date:       2019-01-25 19:45:36
Message-ID: 017c01d4b4e6$8bc77750$a35665f0$ () va-dumt ! se
[Download RAW message or body]


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr=E5n: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net> F=F6r Mark Tinka
Skickat: den 25 januari 2019 11:11
Till: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
=C4mne: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 is a ticking timebomb (CSCvk35460)



On 24/Jan/19 21:12, James Jun wrote:

> May be this is good time to re-hash discussion about replacing ASR920s =

> with something else for 1GE aggregation.

I don't think that's a good-enough reason to oust the box. It's a bug that
"can" be fixed. Focus should be on getting Cisco to see that it's not
unreasonable to expect a network to not reboot a router every so often to
"clear things up", and that high uptime should be expected.


>
> I hear that Juniper is coming out with a different configuration of
> MX204 with lot of 1GE/10GE SFP+ based ports?  This sounds very exciting to
me.. anyone got any details/timeline/etc?
> The power requirement of MX204 is very good and the box is really easy =

> to install at small sites.

I've been talking to Juniper about this very thing - to launch an
MX204-lite, if you will, which focuses on 24 - 48 1Gbps/10Gbps ports, and
40Gbps/100Gbps uplink ports. If they can manage this, then Cisco have a
worthy competitor in this space.

Here's to hoping they listen; I mean, I only started talking them about this
back in 2007, what could go wrong :-)...

Mark.


This is actually kind of interesting, seeing how many reasonably priced
boxes there is int this space for DC switching one would imagine that it
wouldn=92t be all that hard. Looking at the chipset that said boxes use many
of them has support for MPLS. =

I'm a little bit interested in the NCS-540 for this segment although the
prefix side is a bit thin. I haven=92t played with it yet though.
Anyone else run the NCS540 in the Edge role and are there any major
limitations except the 128K ipv4 prefix limit? =


//Gustav

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]