[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] Strange issue
From:       james list <jameslist72 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2018-09-12 17:38:34
Message-ID: CAEcMOL4=7ESOnDcpR80WFYi-7bSrRX9JVnLQEdw2aHOnxFEXjA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks Saku/Lukas
Investigation still on going I will let you know if something is found.

Cheers

Il Mar 11 Set 2018, 00:20 Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> ha scritto:

> Oh I think I misunderstood OP. Yes, sounds like larger packets were
> impacted smaller were not.
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 01:16, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 00:21, Lukas Tribus <lists@ltri.eu> wrote:
> >
> > > > We experienced a strange issue in reaching the remote devices
> (servers) and
> > > > perforiming bulk snmp walk, instead direct object query was working
> fine.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a temporary MTU problem to me ...
> >
> > Please elaborate. Bulk walk does bulk get 'OID X and next Y OIDs'.
> > Specific get is 'OID X'. So what OP is proposing sounds like smaller
> > UDP datagrams didn't pass, but larger did. My doge coins would be on
> > edge policer limiting small UDP packets.
> >
> > --
> >   ++ytti
>
>
>
> --
>   ++ytti
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]