[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN
From:       Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo ! com>
Date:       2015-09-24 19:43:25
Message-ID: BY1PR0701MB1781A2B047EAB7C22378C6B9FA430 () BY1PR0701MB1781 ! namprd07 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I haven't heard of other vendors using it, but there is a IETF draft. A lot of vendors seem to be pushing OTV-like tech or VXLAN. 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hasmit-otv-04

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luan Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 12:57 PM
To: Luis Anzola <anzolex@gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN

While we are on this...
Is OTV still Cisco Proprietary? And still ASR1K and Nexus 7K support from Cisco side?
Wouldn't it better to use L2TPv3 - and MACSEC if need to?

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Luis Anzola <anzolex@gmail.com> wrote:

> Find below a very handy guide for the CSR1Kv and OTV:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Hybrid_Cloud/DRaaS/CSR/CSR/CSR5.html
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Mohammad Khalil 
> <eng_mssk@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I have simulated this on gns3
> > http://eng-mssk.blogspot.com/2015/09/otv-example.html?m=1
> >
> > It might give you a hint
> >
> > BR,
> > Mohammad
> >
> >
> > Sent from Samsung Mobile
> >
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
> > Date:24/09/2015 20:45 (GMT+02:00)
> > To: Luis Anzola <anzolex@gmail.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN
> >
> > Yeah after some further reading I think you are right. I'll extend 
> > the question to include OTV on the CSRv platform. Any experiences 
> > would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luis Anzola [mailto:anzolex@gmail.com <anzolex@gmail.com>]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:22 AM
> > To: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN
> >
> > I would look at OTV instead. It's a technology developed 
> > specifically for DCI implementations and brings very important benefits with it.
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Sep 24, 2015, at 12:56 PM, Steve Mikulasik <
> Steve.Mikulasik@civeo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyone have any experience with VXLAN on the CSRv? I need to span 
> > > L2
> > traffic across hosted datacetners (can't use a physical device 
> > unless it installs on x86 hardware) and was wondering if this is the 
> > way to go on this platform.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]