[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] 3750 Route Map peculiarity.
From:       Pete Lumbis <alumbis () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-02-28 15:38:22
Message-ID: CAB0xJrMFOeebOz293y+Y_bwDNDy=vzxudu2AR9KbGz+nk4OnyQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yep, requires routing SDM template.


On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers@imperial.ac.uk>wrote:

> On 28/02/14 13:41, Michael Robson wrote:
>
>
>> However, now when I apply a created route-map to an interface, it take the
>> 'ip policy route-map' command but nothing appears on configuration for the
>> SVI. If I apply a non-existent policy map to the same interface, the
>> configuration shows up on the SVI.
>>
>
> By "route-map" I assume you actually mean "policy routing"?
>
> You might (probably do) need a routing SDM template for that.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]