[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-nsp
Subject:    Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 81
From:       <alaerte.vidali () nsn ! com>
Date:       2007-04-27 23:34:28
Message-ID: 1A629FEA23F9F14CAF0B8B3A5AA2FC298F07E4 () daebe103 ! NOE ! Nokia ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Humm,,,no support for FRR on BFD under this version. No date to release
yet.

Are you using SIP + SPA for 10GE?
If yes, what is the SIP?

Rgds,
Alaerte 

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Raman Sud [mailto:ramans@cwie.net] 
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 8:02 PM
To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro); Vidali Alaerte (NSN -
BR/Rio de Janeiro)
Subject: RE: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 81

Cisco 6509 with sup 7203bxls running
s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF6.bin"

-----Original Message-----
From: Alaerte Vidali [mailto:Alaerte.Vidali@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:54 PM
To: alaerte.vidali@nsn.com; Raman Sud; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 81

There is normal BFD and recently BFD integrated in FRR.
You can check if there is support for later one on your devices.
What is the platform/IOS?

br,
Alaerte

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Raman Sud
> Received: Sat Apr 28 01:32:55 EEST 2007
> To: alaerte.vidali@nsn.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 81
> 
> It will be on 10GE port on my backbone routers
> 
> I have BFD  already configured on my backbone router and I am using
OSPF
> as an IGP.
> 
> I have MPLS on the entire backbone and would like to give route 
> redundancy to my customer in various cities
> 
> Raman
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alaerte.vidali@nsn.com [mailto:alaerte.vidali@nsn.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:12 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Cc: Raman Sud
> Subject: RE: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 53, Issue 81
> 
> Hi Raman,
> 
> Yes, it works fine if that is your question. 
> But recently Cisco added a warm to not use values lower than 200ms for

> RSVP hellos.
> I could not get the exactly reason it was done. My bet is that some 
> customer complained about CPU usage and low priority when there are 
> instabilities on network burning CPU, which may cause false positives 
> when using value as low as 10ms for RSVP hellos.
> 
> Cisco released BFD for FRR. If you have it available on your 
> platform/IOS, better go on this way.
> If not, just be aware of potential problems with low RSVP timers.
> 
> Configuration is very straightforward. Just global command and
interface
> command defining RSVP hello time and number of misses. I suggest
stress
> your network to verify if you do not have false positives.
> 
> What is the interface you want to use it?
> 
> Good Luck,
> 
> Alaerte
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:03:02 -0700
> From: "Raman Sud" <ramans@cwie.net>
> Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS Fast Reroute
> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	
> <06EF9CEFEF46484EA8A230DA53772DBB941926@Exchange.ccbill-hq.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Has anyone setup MPLS fast-reroute using RSVP? Is there a config that 
> someone can share
>  
> Thanks
>  
> 
> Raman Sud
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:27:27 -0700 (MST)
> From: Bill Nash <billn@billn.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Fast Reroute
> To: Raman Sud <ramans@cwie.net>
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704271426290.22365@pegasus.billn.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> 
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft
> /120limit/120st/120st16/frr.htm
> 
> - billn
> 
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Raman Sud wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]