[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cipe
Subject:    Re: How robust and trusted?
From:       Leo Cyr <lcyr () hereintown ! net>
Date:       1999-07-30 13:16:40
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks to everyone on the list for these replies; I appreciate the time
you put into them.  I've got a much better feel of how cipe is being
used...

Leo

On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Tom Yates wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Leo Cyr wrote:
> 
> > I've played with cipe some, gotten it working and it seems to be great.
> > I'm doing more extensive testing currently, but I'm interested in knowing
> > if anyone here has/is using cipe (esp. 1.3.0) in a production environment?
> > If so what are your experiences?  Does anyone have any reasons why it
> > should not be used in a production environment?  Finally, if this topic
> > has been covered in the past can you point me to the approximate range of
> > dates?
> 
> i've had it between two privately IP'ed networks, routing and NAT provided
> by CISCO routers, very successfully for some weeks now.  extremely robust,
> extremely reliable.  the internet connection was down for two and a half
> days, and when we brought it back up, CIPE just reconnected and carried on
> fine.
> 
> these are production networks.  the client is doing NFS, X, NIS, mail,
> DNS, you name it, over the CIPE link.  it's great.  three cheers for olaf
> et al.
> 
> if anyone would like my CIPE config files, and relevant sections of the
> router config files, please let me know privately.
> 
> 
>    Tom Yates - Senior Networking Specialist - Gatekeeper Technology, Ltd.
> 
> 
> 


--
Message sent by the cipe-l@inka.de mailing list.
Unsubscribe: mail majordomo@inka.de, "unsubscribe cipe-l" in body
Other commands available with "help" in body to the same address.
CIPE info and list archive: <URL:http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]