[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cifs-protocol
Subject:    Re: [cifs-protocol] Q.8 Durability without SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_PERSISTENT_HANDLES- TrackingID#2311070040
From:       Stefan Metzmacher via cifs-protocol <cifs-protocol () lists ! samba ! org>
Date:       2024-01-04 16:38:32
Message-ID: b944062d-2f11-4e74-b230-3342fa864f26 () samba ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Sreekanth,

> section "3.3.5.9.10 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_REQUEST_V2 Create \
> Context" has following text 
> If the SMB2_DHANDLE_FLAG_PERSISTENT bit is set in the Flags field of the request, \
> TreeConnect.Share.IsCA is TRUE, and Connection.ServerCapabilities includes \
> SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_PERSISTENT_HANDLES, the server MUST set Open.IsPersistent to TRUE 
> We clearly see that establishing durable handle as per sections 3.2.4.28/3.2.4.29 \
> (from Question 8)  cannot disregard SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_PERSISTENT_HANDLES. So it is \
> necessary to have both SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_PERSISTENT_HANDLES and \
> SMB2_SHARE_CAP_CONTINUOUS_AVAILABILITY (which sets .IsCA property of network share) \
>  If you think I misunderstood your question, please clarify.
> 
> 
> Question 8:
> The impact of SMB2_SHARE_CAP_CONTINUOUS_AVAILABILITY without \
> SMB2_GLOBAL_CAP_PERSISTENT_HANDLES is a very important part of this.

I guess this related to Question 6.

I guess we can close Question 8.

Thanks!
metze
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]