[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cifs-protocol
Subject:    Re: [cifs-protocol] 119030519730578 server response for oversized alternate data streams
From:       Björn JACKE via cifs-protocol <cifs-protocol () lists ! samba ! org>
Date:       2019-03-14 9:53:26
Message-ID: 20190314095326.GA584 () sernet ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello Edgar!

On 2019-03-14 at 03:56 +0000 Edgar Olougouna sent off:
> It is advised to follow the specification as much as applicable to a given protocol \
> scenario, to enable a greater interoperability coverage between implementations.

thank you very much for your research and the answers on this! We'll see how to
move on with this now. It would be great if explorer could be changed to handle
the error case of STATUS_FILE_SYSTEM_LIMITATION for ADS writes also in a
similar graceful way like it does with VFAT, when no ADS support is there at
all, but this is out of the scope of this dochelp request of course.

Best regards
Björn
-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: 0551-370000-0, mail: kontakt@sernet.de
Gesch.F.: Dr. Johannes Loxen & Reinhild Jung
AG Göttingen: HR-B 2816 - https://www.sernet.de

Samba eXPerience 2019, Hotel Freizeit In
sponsored by Google, Microsoft & Red Hat
June, 4th - 6th 2019, http://sambaXP.org

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]