[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cifs-protocol
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Two Windows 7 machines running same command, with different operations
From: Stephen Martin via cifs-protocol <cifs-protocol () lists ! samba ! org>
Date: 2017-03-24 15:16:20
Message-ID: 90cba17a-a8c8-4b6b-b7b2-b03ea8aa5404 () hypersrv ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Thanks, I too thought thay maybe this list was not right, Do you know a
better suited one? There is not much in the Windows world most of the
list are for SAMBA.
My server implementation is a Windows server 2012, How do you know what
version it is using? I cannot see one in the wireshark diessection and
the Windows 7 clients dont seem to have a way to check. The server
however, now you have prompted me to check does say:
*EnableSMB2Protocol : False*
PS C:\Users\administrator.PABLA> Get-SmbServerConfiguration
AnnounceServer : False
AsynchronousCredits : 64
AutoShareServer : True
AutoShareWorkstation : True
CachedOpenLimit : 5
AnnounceComment :
EnableDownlevelTimewarp : False
EnableLeasing : True
EnableMultiChannel : True
EnableStrictNameChecking : True
AutoDisconnectTimeout : 0
DurableHandleV2TimeoutInSeconds : 30
EnableAuthenticateUserSharing : False
EnableForcedLogoff : True
EnableOplocks : True
EnableSecuritySignature : False
ServerHidden : True
IrpStackSize : 15
KeepAliveTime : 2
MaxChannelPerSession : 32
MaxMpxCount : 50
MaxSessionPerConnection : 16384
MaxThreadsPerQueue : 20
MaxWorkItems : 1
NullSessionPipes :
NullSessionShares :
OplockBreakWait : 35
PendingClientTimeoutInSeconds : 120
RequireSecuritySignature : False
EnableSMB1Protocol : True
*EnableSMB2Protocol : False*
Smb2CreditsMax : 2048
Smb2CreditsMin : 128
SmbServerNameHardeningLevel : 0
TreatHostAsStableStorage : False
ValidateAliasNotCircular : True
ValidateShareScope : True
ValidateShareScopeNotAliased : True
ValidateTargetName : True
EncryptData : False
RejectUnencryptedAccess : True
On 24/03/2017 14:12, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Stephen Martin via cifs-protocol wrote:
>> I am trying to track down a performance issue we are having with some of
>> our workstations. It would appeart that some of our Windows 7 machines
>> access SMB files differently and I believe this may be the cause of the
>> performance issues
> Not sure this is the right list, but: -- why are you using SMB1??
>
> What's your server implementation?
>
> Volker
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>
</p>
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western">
<p>Thanks, I too thought thay maybe this list was not right, Do
you know a better suited one? There is not much in the Windows
world most of the list are for SAMBA.<br>
<br>
My server implementation is a Windows server 2012, How do you
know what version it is using? I cannot see one in the wireshark
diessection and the Windows 7 clients dont seem to have a way to
check. The server however, now you have prompted me to check
does say: <font color="#cc0000"><b>EnableSMB2Protocol
: False</b></font></p>
<p>PS C:\Users\administrator.PABLA> Get-SmbServerConfiguration<br>
<br>
<br>
AnnounceServer : False<br>
AsynchronousCredits : 64<br>
AutoShareServer : True<br>
AutoShareWorkstation : True<br>
CachedOpenLimit : 5<br>
AnnounceComment :<br>
EnableDownlevelTimewarp : False<br>
EnableLeasing : True<br>
EnableMultiChannel : True<br>
EnableStrictNameChecking : True<br>
AutoDisconnectTimeout : 0<br>
DurableHandleV2TimeoutInSeconds : 30<br>
EnableAuthenticateUserSharing : False<br>
EnableForcedLogoff : True<br>
EnableOplocks : True<br>
EnableSecuritySignature : False<br>
ServerHidden : True<br>
IrpStackSize : 15<br>
KeepAliveTime : 2<br>
MaxChannelPerSession : 32<br>
MaxMpxCount : 50<br>
MaxSessionPerConnection : 16384<br>
MaxThreadsPerQueue : 20<br>
MaxWorkItems : 1<br>
NullSessionPipes :<br>
NullSessionShares :<br>
OplockBreakWait : 35<br>
PendingClientTimeoutInSeconds : 120<br>
RequireSecuritySignature : False<br>
EnableSMB1Protocol : True<br>
<font color="#cc0000"><b>EnableSMB2Protocol : False</b></font><br>
Smb2CreditsMax : 2048<br>
Smb2CreditsMin : 128<br>
SmbServerNameHardeningLevel : 0<br>
TreatHostAsStableStorage : False<br>
ValidateAliasNotCircular : True<br>
ValidateShareScope : True<br>
ValidateShareScopeNotAliased : True<br>
ValidateTargetName : True<br>
EncryptData : False<br>
RejectUnencryptedAccess : True
</p>
</div>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/03/2017 14:12, Volker Lendecke
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20170324141218.GD7062@sernet.de" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Stephen Martin via cifs-protocol wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I am trying to track down a performance issue we are having with some of
our workstations. It would appeart that some of our Windows 7 machines
access SMB files differently and I believe this may be the cause of the
performance issues
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Not sure this is the right list, but: -- why are you using SMB1??
What's your server implementation?
Volker
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic