[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cifs-protocol
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] 115051412733033 x.uuidDsa in MS-ADTS 6.2.2.5 - KCC connection translation
From: Sreekanth Nadendla <srenaden () microsoft ! com>
Date: 2015-06-05 18:44:48
Message-ID: BY2PR03MB379440B39B4D44919D982FBC5B20 () BY2PR03MB379 ! namprd03 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello Douglas,
uuidDsa holds actual GUID and NOT GUID based DNS names like \
A2f6c43e-e9c9-4040-a2b0-e9ebf2ec02b8._msdcs.379135dom.lab. We will update the \
relevant sections of MS-ADTS in a future release. Please let me know if you have any \
questions on this.
Regards,
Sreekanth Nadendla
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
-----Original Message-----
From: Sreekanth Nadendla
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:13 AM
To: 'Douglas Bagnall'
Cc: 'cifs-protocol@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: 115051412733033 x.uuidDsa in MS-ADTS 6.2.2.5 - KCC connection \
translation
Hello Douglas, I will be working with you on this issue. I am currently researching \
the problem and will provide you with an update soon. Thank you for your patience.
Regards,
Sreekanth Nadendla
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
-----Original Message-----
From: Sreekanth Nadendla
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:39 PM
To: 'Douglas Bagnall'
Cc: cifs-protocol@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: 115051412733033 x.uuidDsa in MS-ADTS 6.2.2.5 - KCC connection translation
Dochelp in Bcc
Casemail in Cc
Hello Douglas,
Thank you for your inquiry about MS-ADTS specification. We \
have created incident 115051412733033 to track the investigation for this issue. One \
of the Open specifications team member will contact you shortly.
Regards,
Sreekanth Nadendla
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas Bagnall [mailto:douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 7:34 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: cifs-protocol@samba.org
Subject: x.uuidDsa in MS-ADTS 6.2.2.5 - KCC connection translation
hi,
In a couple of places in MS-ADTS 6.2.2.5 (connection translation), the uuidDsa \
attribute of a repsFrom tuple is used as a "GUID-based DNS name". In other places it \
is just a GUID.
The "GUID-based DNS name" phrase occurs in this bit, on page 584 of
v20140502:
* If s and the local DC's nTDSDSA object are in the same site,
cn!transportType has no value, or the RDN of cn!transportType is
CN=IP:
* Bit DRS_MAIL_REP in t.replicaFlags is clear.
* t.uuidTransport = NULL GUID.
* t.uuidDsa = The GUID-based DNS name of s.
* Otherwise:
* Bit DRS_MAIL_REP in t.replicaFlags is set.
* If x is the object with dsname cn!transportType,
t.uuidTransport = x!objectGUID.
* Let a be the attribute identified by
x!transportAddressAttribute. If a is the dNSHostName
attribute, t.uuidDsa = the GUID-based DNS name of s.
Otherwise, t.uuidDsa = (s!parent)!a.
That last phrase ("t.uuidDsa = (s!parent)!a") also refers to a DNS name.
Should we assume these mean something like "the GUID corresponding to the GUID-based \
DNS name"? Or is it never actually a GUID? Or does this really involve some other \
attribute of t other than uuidDsa?
cheers,
Douglas
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic