[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cifs-protocol
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG: 115022012423941] connecting MS-DRSR 4.1.23.2 IDL_DRSReplicaSync and Replic
From: Edgar Olougouna <edgaro () microsoft ! com>
Date: 2015-02-20 22:23:34
Message-ID: CY1PR0301MB1179936093602F2B48F051D5DB2A0 () CY1PR0301MB1179 ! namprd03 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Andrew,
I will research this and follow-up.
Thanks,
Edgar
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Weber
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:55 PM
To: Andrew Bartlett
Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG: 115022012423941] connecting MS-DRSR 4.1.23.2 IDL_DRSReplicaSync and \
ReplicateNCRequestMsg
[Case number in subject]
[Casemail to cc]
[Dochelp to bcc]
Hello Andrew,
Thank you for your request. Case number 115022012423941 has been created for this \
inquiry. One of our team members will follow up with you soon.
Best regards,
Matt Weber | Microsoft Open Specifications Team
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 10:19 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
Subject: connecting MS-DRSR 4.1.23.2 IDL_DRSReplicaSync and ReplicateNCRequestMsg
MS-DRSR 4.1.23 IDL_DRSReplicaSync has some great pseudo-code in 4.1.23.2 Server \
Behavior of the IDL_DRSReplicaSync Method. However, it finishes with this text \
statement:
Perform a replication cycle as a client of IDL_DRSGetNCChanges.
4.1.10.4.1) to form the first request and send it. If not DRS_MAIL_REP in r.options, \
then wait for the response, process it, send the next request (section 4.1.10.6), \
etc., until the replication cycle is complete.
This is great, but I need to know what parameters are passed in to
4.1.10.4.1 ReplicateNCRequestMsg
In particular, I'm trying to chase down an issue in our RODC case, where the \
SPECIAL_SECRETS_PROCESSING flag isn't being sent by our RODC to GetNCChanges. I know \
how I *could* force it, but I don't know if it should always be forced, for example. \
For example, should the server sending DsReplicaSync tell the RODC to request it, or \
should the RODC add it (and remove WRIT_REP) on it's own?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic