[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cifs-protocol
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] connecting MS-DRSR 4.1.23.2 IDL_DRSReplicaSync and ReplicateNCRequestMsg
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet () samba ! org>
Date: 2015-02-20 4:05:19
Message-ID: 1424405119.3822.10.camel () samba ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 16:18 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> MS-DRSR 4.1.23 IDL_DRSReplicaSync has some great pseudo-code in 4.1.23.2
> Server Behavior of the IDL_DRSReplicaSync Method. However, it finishes
> with this text statement:
>
> Perform a replication cycle as a client of IDL_DRSGetNCChanges.
> 4.1.10.4.1) to form the first request and send it. If not DRS_MAIL_REP
> in r.options, then wait for the response, process it, send the next
> request (section 4.1.10.6), etc., until the replication cycle is
> complete.
>
> This is great, but I need to know what parameters are passed in to
> 4.1.10.4.1 ReplicateNCRequestMsg
>
> In particular, I'm trying to chase down an issue in our RODC case, where
> the SPECIAL_SECRETS_PROCESSING flag isn't being sent by our RODC to
> GetNCChanges. I know how I *could* force it, but I don't know if it
> should always be forced, for example. For example, should the server
> sending DsReplicaSync tell the RODC to request it, or should the RODC
> add it (and remove WRIT_REP) on it's own?
>
Also, what are the arguments when
"MS-ADTS 3.1.1.1.14
Scheduled and Event-Driven Replication" calls IDL_DRSGetNCChanges?
Thanks,
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic