[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cifs-protocol
Subject:    Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED?
From:       Sebastian Canevari <Sebastian.Canevari () microsoft ! com>
Date:       2013-10-29 20:43:58
Message-ID: 7901FC82BA1FD640885A2B4A344BC2350749A775 () TK5EX14MBXC288 ! redmond ! corp ! microsoft ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hehehe.... that... trust me... never crossed my mind as a possibility!

Glad to know that you quickly found out the issue.

I'll take a look at the files and let you know of my findings.

Thanks!

Sebastian


Sebastian Canevari | Escalation Engineer | US-CSS Developer Support Core (D=
SC) Protocol Team
P +1 469 775 7849 =

One Microsoft Way, 98052, Redmond, WA, USA http://support.microsoft.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE] =

Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:41 PM
To: Sebastian Canevari
Cc: pfif@tridgell.net; cifs-protocol@samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACC=
EPTED?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:05:25PM +0000, Sebastian Canevari wrote:
> Looking into the script, it seems like the reason for that message is tha=
t an "off" switch is being used before an "on" switch.

Hmmmm. You don't want to know the reason why it failed ...

Well, I'll tell you anyway: My freakin mail client stripped the ^M from the=
 line endings while saving t.txt. Sorry for the noise. :-)

Attached find the cab and cap files.

Thanks!

Volker

--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 G=F6ttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG G=F6ttingen, HRB 2816, GF=
: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt@sernet.de
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]