[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cifs-protocol
Subject:    Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo()
From:       Bill Wesse <billwe () microsoft ! com>
Date:       2010-03-22 19:47:43
Message-ID: 38B58112393ABF47AA9F6B99206881E1354AB8D8 () TK5EX14MBXC137 ! redmond ! corp ! microsoft ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Good day again Tim. For administrative purposes, I will archive this case until I \
hear back from you.

I have attached [MS-SMB]_Changes.pdf, showing the changes that will be made; these \
are essentially the same as those previously proposed for [MS-CIFS]. Please see the \
attached [MS-CIFS]_Changes.pdf, which will not be implemented.

These changes will be available in a future document refresh.

Please let me know if this satisfies your request; if so, I will consider the case \
resolved. Thanks for helping us improve our documentation.

Also, just to confirm the below, omitted WordCount/ByteCount should not be treated as \
erroneous - at least from a Windows client. This is not the case for all DOS errors.

Documenting these cases would require me to open a new case - please let me know if \
you wish us to pursue this.

Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
Email:	billwe@microsoft.com
Tel: 	+1(980) 776-8200
Cell: 	+1(704) 661-5438
Fax: 	+1(704) 665-9606


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wesse 
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:06 AM
To: 'Tim Prouty'
Cc: 'Jeremy Allison'; 'cifs-protocol@samba.org'; 'pfif@tridgell.net'
Subject: FW: Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header

Good morning Tim - I am resending this, as I have not received a reply to my previous \
email (shown below).

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wesse
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 11:34 AM
To: 'Tim Prouty'
Cc: Jeremy Allison; cifs-protocol@samba.org; pfif@tridgell.net
Subject: Status: SRX091209600095 Trans2SetPathInfo() returns truncated SMB header

I have attached [MS-SMB]_Changes.pdf, showing the changes that will be made; these \
are essentially the same as those previously proposed for [MS-CIFS]. Please see the \
attached [MS-CIFS]_Changes.pdf, which will not be implemented.

These changes will be available in a future document refresh.

Please let me know if this satisfies your request; if so, I will consider the case \
resolved. Thanks for helping us improve our documentation.

Also, just to confirm the below, omitted WordCount/ByteCount should not be treated as \
erroneous - at least from a Windows client. This is not the case for all DOS errors.

Documenting these cases would require me to open a new case - please let me know if \
you wish us to pursue this.


On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Bill Wesse wrote:

> This is processed as follows before appearing on the wire:
> 
> If the SrvIsSrvStatus(Status) check passes (which it should, in this 
> case, per the included #defines from cifs.h), the error code is 
> truncated using the SrvErrorClass(Status) macro (also from cifs.h), 
> and the error class is set to SMB_ERR_CLASS_DOS (0x1). The 
> SMB_FLAGS2_NT_STATUS bit is cleared in the response header.Flags2 
> field, and the return context is marked to omit WordCount and 
> ByteCount.

Hmm, I didn't know that there are cases where the WordCount and ByteCount are \
omitted.  Is this the case for all DOS errors?  Is it possible to document the cases \
when they are omitted?  As it is there is samba client code that detects an omitted \
WordCount/ByteCount in this situation as an error, so if this is correct server \
behavior we'll need to update the client.


Regards,
Bill Wesse
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
Email:	billwe@microsoft.com
Tel: 	+1(980) 776-8200
Cell: 	+1(704) 661-5438
Fax: 	+1(704) 665-9606


["[MS-CIFS]_Changes.pdf" (application/pdf)]
["[MS-SMB]_Changes.pdf" (application/pdf)]

_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol@cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]