[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cherokee
Subject:    Re: [Cherokee] Proud Cherokee Users
From:       Leonardo Santagada <santagada () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-12-17 14:39:13
Message-ID: 6148C49D-E5FB-4A7E-A5D1-5D9B0221EE33 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:

> On 17-dic-08, at 13:40, Miguel Angel wrote:
>> 2008/12/17 Tim Post <echo@echoreply.us>
>> I define 'crap' as a page that just regurgitates some RSS feed while
>> plastering it with ads. Now we get into adult sites, what about  
>> those?
>> Making the link say [ADULTS ONLY] seems good to me and demonstrates
>> why
>> human review is needed.
>>
>> I agree that human revision would be totally needed in the case of
>> real links.
>> And that's a problem, because the project needs a lot of workforce
>> in many
>> other parts that probably are more important that links.
>
> We need to protect it against spam. That's all. I don't think we
> should even try to judge domains content. Actually, I don't mind
> whether it's a blog, an ads server, porn, or anything else, as long as
> it runs Cherokee.
>
> IMO, we ought to do something as plain as simple as: If your domain
> uses Cherokee you are very welcome to add it to our fancy "Proud
> Cherokee Users" list. Depending of the content, we'll get a relevance
> value that will be used to sort the domain list: The most interesting
> domains will much more visible at the the top, the 'crap' will end up
> at the bottom.
>
> At the end of the day, it's buzz. We aren't building a list of
> anything worth reviewing by a human, don't you think?

Why not just put a nofollow on the links so it doesn't interfere with  
anyones pagerank?


--
Leonardo Santagada
santagada at gmail.com



_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee@lists.octality.com
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]