[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cfrg
Subject:    Re: [CFRG] Quantum computer?
From:       cryptography subs <cryptosub063546647=40syfershock.com () dmarc ! ietf ! org>
Date:       2024-03-11 11:17:57
Message-ID: E1rjdfI-000vHH-2v () lamp
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 04:28:45 +0000
Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:

> Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL writes:
> 
> > Then why are you (Peter and Scott) wasting your time participating in this
> > debate?
> 
> When did you see either of us participating?  I've just been deleting the
> messages as they come up (and there's an awful lot of them to delete), in the
> same way that I'd delete messages discussing how to defend against
> heffalumps [*], or unicorns, or fairies.
> 
> In any case in the headlong rush to focus on anti-heffalump defences while
> leaving more pressing problems unaddressed it's probably good to have a few
> dissenting voices to point out that not everyone here (or in the world in
> general) believes in heffalumps.

Thread OP wrote, "bring on the memes". I'll see your memes and raise you one meme and \
a video. Behold a 'heffalump and woozle' meme regarding the prognostications of \
quantum cryptology:

  | Heffalump Hackerz & Woozle Wizards
  | 'quantum hysteria' and 'quantum scaremongering'.
  | https://neon.nightbulb.net/firefly/p/1709468944.350756

The linked page contains a infographic. Also enclosed find a short, \
three-minutes-long video link.

-- 
    3883@sugar.bug | sybershock.com| sci.crypt | alt.sources.crypto

_______________________________________________
CFRG mailing list
CFRG@irtf.org
https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]