[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cfe-dev
Subject:    Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] [RFC] Raising LLVM minimum required MSVC version to 2013 for trunk
From:       Chris Bieneman <beanz () apple ! com>
Date:       2015-01-31 1:17:01
Message-ID: EE468A54-8446-41CC-AADC-1D46F288EC8E () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes. I'll handle the documentation updates too.

I'll base the list of C++11 features on the MSDN documentation.

-Chris

> On Jan 30, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman@apple.com> wrote:
> > +Alex Bradbury
> > 
> > Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012.
> > 
> > So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler's proposal for making \
> > this transition. For those who don't want to dig through to the beginning here's \
> > the basic plan: 
> > 1) Loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev (Done!)
> > 2) Wait until this email fully circulates in digests and LLVM Weekly so that \
> > everyone who has an objection can voice it 3) If there are no objections, Commit \
> > a change to the CMake build which errors on old MSVC versions 4) Revert and fix \
> > buildbots 5) Repeat 3 & 4 until no issues
> > 6) Once the change is live for a week with no issues, update the documentation to \
> > reflect the minimum required MSVC version as 2013
> 
> Also:
> 
> 7) Update the documentation as to what minimum set of C++11 features
> are allowed in the code base.
> 
> > Alex, can you please make sure that this plan makes it into the next LLVM Weekly? \
> > If there are no objections this time I will update CMake files a few days after \
> > the LLVM Weekly goes out.
> 
> Can you also handle the documentation updates a few days after the
> CMake changes have been made live?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> ~Aaron


_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]