[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cfe-dev
Subject:    Re: [cfe-dev] Adding support for multiple non-virtual inheritance	for -cxx-abi microsoft
From:       John McCall <rjmccall () apple ! com>
Date:       2013-04-08 18:36:24
Message-ID: 335FA511-F0BE-4408-8D54-3C3FD367343A () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Olivier Goffart <ogoffart@kde.org> wrote:
> On Monday 08 April 2013 22:02:17 Timur Iskhodzhanov wrote:
>> 2013/4/8 John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>:
> =

>>> I also find it curious that MSVC uses a thunk for member pointers, since
>>> the required this-adjustment is already plainly expressible in the memb=
er
>>> pointer value.
>> =

>> Me too actually.
>> Reid, wdyt?
> =

> Actualy, in MSVC API, the pointer to member function are just sizeof(void=
*) in =

> the single inheritance case. It does not contains enough bits to put an o=
ffset.  =

> (We had that discussion before :-) )

We were originally just talking about the multiple-inheritance case here,
although it seems like there may have been confusion =97 it sounds like the=
re
may be a thunk for virtual member functions regardless of inheritance model.

John.
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]