From cfe-dev Tue Mar 19 11:43:27 2013 From: Olivier Goffart Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:43:27 +0000 To: cfe-dev Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Clang-based indexer and code navigator Message-Id: <71796963.8Rm7dWcKhU () gargamel> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=cfe-dev&m=136369462932276 On Tuesday 12 March 2013 11:00:31 David R=F6thlisberger wrote: [...] > As you know, the clang C++ API is unstable. What is your plan for > maintaining sourceweb? Have you evaluated the stable C api ("libclang")? > Is there anything missing from libclang that prevented you from using > it? If the missing areas aren't huge, perhaps effort would be better > spent improving the libclang API than keeping an out-of-tree tool in > sync with the C++ API. Personally, I used the C++ API rather than libclang because I wanted to = develop in C++ and not in C. I think C is an inferior language compared to C++, and I did not want to = write my C++ wrapper around the C API while there is already a very good C+= + = API. Also the C++ API is stable enough, I have started working with clang 3.1, a= nd = now using clang from trunk, there was only a couple of incompatible change. -- = Olivier _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev