[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cfe-commits
Subject:    Re: Embedded Bitcode in Object Files
From:       Steven Wu via cfe-commits <cfe-commits () lists ! llvm ! org>
Date:       2016-02-29 19:08:06
Message-ID: B46288AF-C329-455B-B00C-098DE748F268 () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Ping. I don't know who is the best review for the patches. Thanks for Rafael looking \
at the LLVM change. Richard, do you have any opinions on the clang changes?

Thanks

Steven

> On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Steven Wu <stevenwu@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I put up some patches for embedding bitcode inside the object file \
> (-fembed-bitcode) option. As I described in the dev list before, the new option can \
> create normal object file with bitcode embedded in a special section. You can \
> easily recreate the same object file with the embedded bitcode in it. 
> I split the patch into several parts:
> llvm patch:
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17388: Introduce the section for embedding bitcode in \
> MachO file. 
> There are four clang patches:
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17390: Implementing the clang driver for the new option.
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D17392: Teach clang how to embed bitcode into the object \
> file. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17393: Slightly tweak the bitcode emitted in embed \
> bitcode stage 1. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394: Reduce the amount of option gets \
> embedded in the bitcode by introducing a whitelist and a blacklist. 
> Let me know if anyone is interested in helping reviewing these changes.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Steven
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]