[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: cfe-commits
Subject: Re: [PATCH] D11789: Modify DeclaratorChuck::getFunction to be passed an Exception Specification Sour
From: Richard Smith <richard () metafoo ! co ! uk>
Date: 2015-08-06 3:32:04
Message-ID: 874dc4a0f5537c48bc5e5678ef0bea75 () localhost ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]
rsmith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:7447-7450
@@ -7446,1 +7446,6 @@
+ if (const FunctionProtoType *FPT = R->getAs<FunctionProtoType>()) {
+ if (FPT->hasExceptionSpec()) {
+ auto LocBeg = D.getFunctionTypeInfo().getExceptionSpecLocBeg();
+ auto LocEnd = D.getFunctionTypeInfo().getExceptionSpecLocEnd();
+ Diag(LocBeg, diag::err_function_concept_exception_spec)
----------------
nwilson wrote:
> rsmith wrote:
> > This will assert if there isn't a `FunctionTypeInfo` for the declaration, which \
> > can theoretically happen if it's declared via an (ill-formed today) `typedef`. \
> > (It also might not provide a source range if the exception specification is \
> > implicit, for instance because the function template is a destructor or \
> > deallocation function, but passing an empty SourceRange to the FixItHint should \
> > just result it in being ignored.)
> Hmm, I'm not sure if we'd run into that case because I don't believe we can have a \
> `concept` specified as a typedef (check is yet to be added) and a check exists for \
> being in a non-namespace scope. Do you think a check should still be added \
> verifying that the FunctionTypeInfo exists?
Yes, you should check that a `FunctionTypeInfo` exists (`isFunctionDeclarator`) \
rather than assuming that it does. The testcase would look something like this:
typedef int Fn() noexcept;
template<typename T> concept Fn C;
I think we'll discard the `noexcept` early at the moment, but that's not something \
you should be subtly relying on here (especially given that \
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4533.html is looming on the \
horizon). Something like:
SourceRange Range;
if (D.isFunctionDeclarator())
Range = D.getFunctionTypeInfo().getExceptionSpecRange();
... should handle this safely.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11789
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic