[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ceph-devel
Subject:    RE: building boost statically
From:       Allen Samuels <Allen.Samuels () sandisk ! com>
Date:       2016-04-30 3:24:24
Message-ID: BN3PR02MB1206983484A635905E9B630BE8670 () BN3PR02MB1206 ! namprd02 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Let's not wait. 

As another option. If all we're looking for is "small_vector", then I looked at \
taking the equivalent out of the Folly library a while ago. It looked like it would \
be relatively easy to hack up the one header file to make it standalone. Then we \
could just include it in the Ceph source tree as a common file (it's a header-only \
thing). Once we're confident that all of the relevant distro's are updated we can \
easily dispose of the file and do a top level rename. 


Allen Samuels
Software Architect, Fellow, Systems and Software Solutions 

2880 Junction Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134
T: +1 408 801 7030| M: +1 408 780 6416
allen.samuels@SanDisk.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 6:44 PM
> To: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>
> Cc: Haomai Wang <haomai@xsky.com>; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: building boost statically
> 
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Haomai Wang <haomai@xsky.com>
> wrote:
> > > Yes, I'm always glad to see more deps removed!
> > 
> > It's not removed, it's just moved. The Ceph project will then be on
> > the hook for all boost security updates.
> > 
> > I think we should bundle less not more.  Build times are already long
> enough...
> 
> If building separate packages and including them in all the repos is in fact
> easier, that seems like the right choice.  Static linkage makes development
> easier, but we can make do.
> 
> Whether it's static or dynamic, though, we're on the hook for updating the
> packages for bugs or security update either way.  Unless we just give up an
> wait for the distros to catch up, but I don't think that's a viable option...
> 
> sage
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]