[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ceph-devel
Subject: Re: dumpling integration : valgrind leak
From: Loic Dachary <loic () dachary ! org>
Date: 2015-01-30 17:56:28
Message-ID: 54CBC5CC.5050706 () dachary ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
After a little digging I found \
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/02fae9fc54c10b5a932102bac43f32199d4cb612 which \
seems to be a plausible fix in dumpling also https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3552. \
What do you think ?
On 30/01/2015 16:35, Samuel Just wrote:
> Yeah, that's probably new.
> -Sam
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> > Hi Sam,
> >
> > I stumbled upon what seems to be a leak at \
> > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-29_15:41:06-rados-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/730305/ \
> > and the valgrind xml file is at \
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/attachments/download/1610/v.txt
> > <text>612 (584 direct, 28 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss \
> > record 268 of 287</text> <fn>operator new(unsigned long)</fn>
> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::get_object_context(hobject_t const&, bool)</fn>
> > <line>4585</line>
> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::find_object_context(hobject_t const&, ObjectContext**, \
> > bool, snapid_t*)</fn> <line>4658</line>
> > <fn>ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)</fn>
> > <line>835</line>
> > <fn>PG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, \
> > ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> <line>1455</line>
> > <fn>OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, \
> > std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> \
> > <line>7169</line> <fn>OSD::OpWQ::_process(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, \
> > ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> <line>7141</line>
> > <fn>ThreadPool::WorkQueueVal<std::pair<boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>, \
> > std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest> >, boost::intrusive_ptr<PG> \
> > >::_void_process(void*, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)</fn> <line>191</line>
> > <fn>ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)</fn>
> > <line>128</line>
> > <fn>ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()</fn>
> > <line>318</line>
> > <fn>start_thread</fn>
> > <line>312</line>
> > <fn>clone</fn>
> > <line>111</line>
> >
> > A quick grep of get_object_context in redmine does not hit. Does it ring a bell ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > dumpling backport inventory: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560
> > ticket: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10697
> >
> > --
> > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic