[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: centos-devel
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] The c10s dist tag confusion: .el10+3 > .el10
From: Troy Dawson <tdawson () redhat ! com>
Date: 2024-02-14 17:29:45
Message-ID: CAKndyURKSRL4=Rx1rfQ9aERVZL3KxaUfFiYXd50z9F7zgh6zBA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 14. 02. 24 15:17, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com
> > <mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com
> > <mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many
> builds use
> > .el10+3
> > > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so,
> how do we
> > > deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?
> > >
> >
> > I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to
> move
> > to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number
> > in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.
> >
> >
> > Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more.
> > We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using
> their
> > own buildroots, and nothing from ELN).
> > We expect that will take a week.
> > We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild.
>
> Bumping the more significant digit or not?
>
> > In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in
> practice.
> > There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end
> everything
> > making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag.
>
> So basically even if it won't sort correctly, the .el10+X uilds are not
> intended to be composed/distributed beyond Koji. Do I get that right?
>
Well, they are in the composes right now. But you are not expected to use
them, and if you are, don't gripe to us.
There will be no el10+ packages at the RHEL 10 Beta.
If there are still el10+ packages when we are getting close to beta, start
working with the package maintainer.
In an ideal world, there will be no el10+ packages by the end of the month.
But I'm a realist, and am expecting something to go wrong somewhere.
Troy
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok <<a \
href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com">mhroncok@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</div><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 14. 02. 24 15:17, \
Troy Dawson wrote:<br> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <<a \
href="mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com" target="_blank">ngompa13@gmail.com</a> <br> > \
<mailto:<a href="mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">ngompa13@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br> > <br>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <<a \
href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com" target="_blank">mhroncok@redhat.com</a><br> > \
<mailto:<a href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com" \
target="_blank">mhroncok@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br> > ><br>
> > Hello.<br>
> ><br>
> > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many \
builds use<br> > .el10+3<br>
> > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, \
how do we<br> > > deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?<br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to \
move<br> > to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading \
number<br> > in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more.<br>
> We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using their \
<br> > own buildroots, and nothing from ELN).<br>
> We expect that will take a week.<br>
> We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild.<br>
<br>
Bumping the more significant digit or not?<br>
<br>
> In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in \
practice.<br> > There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end \
everything <br> > making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 \
dist-tag.<br> <br>
So basically even if it won't sort correctly, the .el10+X uilds are not <br>
intended to be composed/distributed beyond Koji. Do I get that \
right?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, they are in the composes right now. \
But you are not expected to use them, and if you are, don't gripe to \
us.</div><div>There will be no el10+ packages at the RHEL 10 Beta.</div><div>If there \
are still el10+ packages when we are getting close to beta, start working with the \
package maintainer.</div><div>In an ideal world, there will be no el10+ packages by \
the end of the month.</div><div>But I'm a realist, and am expecting something to \
go wrong somewhere.</div><div>Troy</div><div><br></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic