[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       centos-devel
Subject:    Re: [CentOS-devel] Adding s390x as an alternative architecture
From:       Jason DeTiberus <jdetiber () redhat ! com>
Date:       2017-08-01 15:18:00
Message-ID: CAFJ7vd89uYrqzHw0Quy2Ra5NuUOtRn=rhqZnm42Awbvdxyjw_A () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

KB,

Should we spin up a formal SIG around this?

--
Jason DeTiberus

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
> On 14/07/17 17:15, Jason DeTiberus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Brian Stinson <brian@bstinson.com
>> <mailto:brian@bstinson.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Jul 13 12:59, James O'Connor wrote:
>>     >
> <snip>
>>
>> I've recently become aware of the Open Mainframe Project
>> (https://www.openmainframeproject.org/). I'm wondering if there are
>> possible collaboration efforts there that could help with hardware access.
>>
>
> Well, as we're talking about building the distro, the policy for this
> (from a CentOS side) was that from a security/auditing PoV we always
> said that distro build should happen on machine under our control, and
> so hosted.
>
>
> --
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]