[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: centos-devel
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Ceph Jewel packaging in CentOS Storage SIG
From: Brian Stinson <brian () bstinson ! com>
Date: 2016-07-31 0:37:12
Message-ID: 20160731003712.GA10695 () ender ! bstinson ! lan
[Download RAW message or body]
How are things looking to get ready to promote this to mirror.centos.org?
Cheers!
--Brian
On Jul 30 16:05, François Cami wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com> wrote:
> > So just to make sure everyone knows: Puppet OpenStack upstream CI is
> > currently deploy Ceph using CentOS SIG - Jewel repository and ALL
> > WORKS SUPER FINE.
>
> This is awesome, thanks a lot for testing & sharing.
>
> > Thanks a lot for your work, we appreciate it :-)
>
> We haven't changed anything from upstream - they do a very good job already :)
>
> Thanks!
> François
>
>
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Ok we did it working, packaging is good. Thanks again!
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Emilien Macchi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 7, 2016 2:44 PM, "Ken Dreyer" <kdreyer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "service ceph start mon.a" looks weird, since Jewel uses systemd.
> > > > Typically you'd do something like:
> > > >
> > > > systemctl start mon@a
> > > >
> > > > Where "a" is $(hostname -s).
> > > >
> > > > - Ken
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > testing it right now and it does not work:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://logs.openstack.org/64/339064/4/check/gate-puppet-ceph-puppet-beaker-rspec-centos-7-nv/4d10ec0/console.html#_2016-07-07_17_04_07_781208
> > > > >
> > > > > Any help is appreciated, I'll put some updates here if I have.
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:19 PM, François Cami <fcami@fedoraproject.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Emilien,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, François Cami
> > > > > > <fcami@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Can someone give an update please? Almost 2 months we're waiting for
> > > > > > > > Ceph packaging, I would like to understand what are the current
> > > > > > > > blockers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thomas (and possibly others) fixed cbs' aarch64 buildroot at the end
> > > > > > > of last week.
> > > > > > > The result is:
> > > > > > > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97967
> > > > > > > However, I don't have time to test anything now. I'll try to tag the
> > > > > > > package so that it lands into the -testing repository as soon as
> > > > > > > possible.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please have a look at:
> > > > > > http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ceph-jewel/
> > > > > > I'm currently building Ceph-10.2.2 and will update the repository ASAP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm working on openstack/puppet-ceph module to deploy Ceph Jewel \
> > > > > > > > > for OpenStack TripleO and Red Hat Director (OpenStack installers).
> > > > > > > > > I'm very interested to know when I'll be able to download Jewel
> > > > > > > > > packages from SIG on x84_64:
> > > > > > > > > buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/ceph-jewel/ currently
> > > > > > > > > does not contain Ceph packages.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Using ceph.com repositories for us is not optimal as we try to use \
> > > > > > > > > a maximum of CentOS supported repositories, like we do for \
> > > > > > > > > OpenStack.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Emilien Macchi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Emilien Macchi
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > > > > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > > > > > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Emilien Macchi
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > > > > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > > > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Emilien Macchi
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic