[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       centos-devel
Subject:    Re: [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Adding an alternative architecture to your SIG.
From:       François_Cami <fcami () fedoraproject ! org>
Date:       2016-05-09 14:49:19
Message-ID: CADa9dq2QLiB0_Sqpd9wYsvK4XYNKLFWRhNoNU73_wQzoVxqnPQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Oulevey <thomas.oulevey@cern.ch> wrote:
>
> We are able to build packages for new arches we need to propose a
> workflow to support a new architecture in a SIG project.
>
> Two use cases :
>
> A/ It's an official architecture.
> -> Sources *must* build for all enable architecture. SIGs are
> responsible to fix issues for all arches.
> -> We provide a script that will rebuild existing arch specific packages
> (scratch build + merge scratch build) if needed. (Note: In case only
> newer version of your project supports this arch, this step may be skipped.)
>
> => "On Monday SIG board decided to enable aarch64, and then all new
> tasks must build for aarch64."

+1 from me on behalf of the Ceph Storage SIG.

François
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]