[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       centos
Subject:    Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense
From:       Christopher Chan <christopher.chan () bradbury ! edu ! hk>
Date:       2011-09-22 0:49:58
Message-ID: 4E7A8636.5090805 () bradbury ! edu ! hk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday, September 22, 2011 07:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Christopher Chan
> <christopher.chan@bradbury.edu.hk>  wrote:
>>>
>>> No LTS? - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
>>> ----
>>
>> For Ubuntu's definition of 'support'. It is in no way comparable to what
>> you can get in previous Centos releases. It is 'comparable' to CEntos 6
>> - none
>
> Errr, what?  Apt-get is still happily getting updates, and without any
> fiddling around with temporary changes to recommended-but-not-default
> repositories.
>

Errr, like not fixing functional breakage even though the package is in 
a current LTS release and even though patches that work were provided by 
others. eg: Hardy -> pidgin which lost YM capabilities.

Backports like the big ones RH did for C5 do not exist in any Ubuntu 
release.

So please, do not ever compare Ubuntu LTS with RHEL. Ubuntu LTS is a 
joke. Of course, currently Centos 6 is a joke too but the landscape is 
probably going to change very soon.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]