[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       calligra-devel
Subject:    Re: After 2.9.7
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2015-08-28 13:43:12
Message-ID: alpine.LNX.2.00.1508281539330.28597 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Cyrille Berger wrote:

> On 2015-08-27 09:57, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> For Krita, and I hate to say this, it probably makes sense to fork our
>> shared libraries. The office-apps maintainers can then strip out all 
>> the
>> krita-specific stuff, and for Krita, we can strip out the stuff that 
>> only
>> makes sense for office applications.
>
> So basically, splitting up krita from calligra? Or did I misunderstood 
> something?
>

Well, we started the discussion with the idea that making separate repos
for the libraries and applications was going to be useful. That rather 
soon turned into a discussion of the problems we have making our libraries
fit for purpose for all applications, and that turned into "why should,
e.g., words and the libraries be in a separate repo, it's only a lot of 
hassle".

And that's where the discussion stopped, so I wrote this mail to re-engage
the discussion.

Boudewijn
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic