On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Yuë Liu <yue.liu@mail.com> wrote:
We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master
branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the
features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So
master will always keep stable.
I don't think we have to be as extreme as restricting commit rights. We have become pretty good at putting up review requests, IMHO. I think we are at a fine balance of not putting up every little thing, but also getting review on potentially harmful changes.
I am all in favor of a testing branch is however how do we ensure that it gets sufficient testing.