[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       calligra-devel
Subject:    Re: Using the Tables brand/trade name for a spreadsheet application
From:       Elvis Stansvik <elvstone () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-03-07 12:02:29
Message-ID: CAHms=eYzjgtYXi0h9UExwEo1A+PVoe190U6OBgkg1Yg_zqAVTQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2012/3/7 Sebastian Sauer <mail@dipe.org>:
> On 03/07/2012 12:14 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>
>> 10. Numbers n shit loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Flats by 4–2
>> => I would not see that as serious proposal, or? I mean I think an
>> application should not be named "shit"... maybe make it "sheet" if you like
>> something else?
>
>
> Thinking again I guess that option disqualifies itself cause of Apple's
> Numbers, right?
>
> Personally I would suggest to choose a name that stays close to our goal to
> have a "standard-name" like Words or Stage that by itself is not a brand but
> should be only used in combination with our common Calligra brand. So, e.g.
> "Calligra XYZ" rather then "XYZ" where XYZ is not something that has a
> strong stand (means an own strong name like e.g. Calligra or KSpread had). I
> also would suggest to not add a K-prefix or some other 1-2 letter
> shorty-combination.
>
> Some more brainstorming;
> * Calligra Worksheet
> * Calligra Compute
> * Calligra Count
> * Calligra Evaluation / Eval
> * Calligra Value
> * Calligra Calculation / Calc
> * Calligra Proceed
> * Calligra Accounting / Account
> * Calligra Fiscal
> * Calligra Budget
> * Calligra Arithmetic
> * Calligra Bill
> * Calligra Invoice
> * Calligra Costing

My suggestion is

* Calligra Crunch

Cheers,
Elvis
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]