[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       calligra-devel
Subject:    Re: Using the Tables brand/trade name for a spreadsheet application
From:       Sebastian Sauer <mail () dipe ! org>
Date:       2012-03-07 11:44:48
Message-ID: 4F574A30.10008 () dipe ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 03/07/2012 12:14 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> 10. Numbers n shit loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Flats by 4–2
> => I would not see that as serious proposal, or? I mean I think an 
> application should not be named "shit"... maybe make it "sheet" if you 
> like something else?

Thinking again I guess that option disqualifies itself cause of Apple's 
Numbers, right?

Personally I would suggest to choose a name that stays close to our goal 
to have a "standard-name" like Words or Stage that by itself is not a 
brand but should be only used in combination with our common Calligra 
brand. So, e.g. "Calligra XYZ" rather then "XYZ" where XYZ is not 
something that has a strong stand (means an own strong name like e.g. 
Calligra or KSpread had). I also would suggest to not add a K-prefix or 
some other 1-2 letter shorty-combination.

Some more brainstorming;
* Calligra Worksheet
* Calligra Compute
* Calligra Count
* Calligra Evaluation / Eval
* Calligra Value
* Calligra Calculation / Calc
* Calligra Proceed
* Calligra Accounting / Account
* Calligra Fiscal
* Calligra Budget
* Calligra Arithmetic
* Calligra Bill
* Calligra Invoice
* Calligra Costing

_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]