--===============1782893506== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba2123e5a564b304a162ee11 --90e6ba2123e5a564b304a162ee11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:26 AM, wrote: > On Wednesday 20 April 2011 06:49:30 Yue Liu wrote: > > > If that is not allowed in the odf specification you can't use the draw > > > namespace. > > > > > > I think the biggest obstacle (as often) is to work around the odf > > > specification. > > > > > > > > > I haven't found out where it says which kind of style property cannot > be > > > > applied on which kind of draw element, but I found in 17.1 it says > "Styles > > may contain additional information that is not defined by formatting > > properties. " And I've test an odg file with draw:shadow in draw:g 's > style > > and it causes no problem while open in libreoffice. So I think it'll be > > okay to break the specification. > > Well if the spec does not forbid applying a shadow to a group shape, then > fine. > Then the only addition would be to specify the blur-radius as a style > attribute, right? > > That atribute has already added under koffice namespace several month ago. > Ciao Jan > > PS: You might be interested in > http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/. > > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > -- Yue Liu --90e6ba2123e5a564b304a162ee11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:26 AM, <jaham@gmx.net> wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 06:49:30 Yue L= iu wrote:
> > If that is not allowed in the odf specification you can't use= the draw
> > namespace.
> >
> > I think the biggest obstacle (as often) is to work around the odf=
> > specification.
> >
> >
> > I haven't found out where it says which kind of style propert= y cannot be
>
> applied on which kind of draw element, but I found in 17.1 it says &qu= ot;Styles
> may contain additional information that is not defined by formatting > properties. " And I've test an odg file with draw:shadow in d= raw:g 's style
> and it causes no problem while open in libreoffice. So I think it'= ll be
> okay to break the specification.

Well if the spec does not forbid applying a shadow to a group s= hape, then fine.
Then the only addition would be to specify the blur-radius as a style
attribute, right?

That atribute has already added under koffice namespa= ce several month ago.
Ciao Jan

PS: You might be interested in
http://tools.services.openoffice.org/odfvalidator/.

_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel



--
Yue Liu
--90e6ba2123e5a564b304a162ee11-- --===============1782893506== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel --===============1782893506==--