[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: calligra-devel
Subject: Re: release schedule proposal
From: Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date: 2011-02-02 10:47:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.1102021144160.10911 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Inge Wallin wrote:
> While this is true, the Linux distros work the same way. I think we should ask
> the packagers first what they think of the idea.
I think packaging is mostly automated these days. It'll be possible, though, that
one or more of the distros will pick a snapshot that fits their schedule and bundle
it. I would be fine with that, actually, if we keep master stable.
> Good! I didn't see this in the original suggestion, though. Hence my
> objections. I dislike it a little bit less now. :-) Do you have any thoughts
> on when to interrupt this scheme
Basically, when we agree that Calligra is now ready for real users. Given that
I have found nine big issues with Stage while preparing three slides for Fosdem,
it might take a couple of months... (I'm keeping a list.)
> and go to X releases per year (4 is not yet
> decided)?
That number is something we can discuss at the sprint -- but personally,
I like anything from 4 to 6 :-)
Boudewijn
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic