[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       calligra-devel
Subject:    Re: Subject for usability testing
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2011-01-25 10:24:21
Message-ID: 201101251124.21291.boud () valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 24 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 17:59, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@valdyas.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 January 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > 
> > > I think dockers are more intensively discussed these weeks, with some
> > > code appearing here ant there. So the answer IMHO would be: dockers.
> > > Regarding startup, asking them about the current startup dialog would
> > > result in notes we already more or less have (and probably some new).
> > > So after we collect all the expected observations regarding the
> > > startup, e.g. on the wiki pages like [1], the students' usability test
> > > will be more than useful to validate correctness of the observati
> > 
> > I would very much prefer to start from scratch here -- not try to fix issues with \
> > the current startup screen, or even with mockups based on the current mechanism, \
> > but go back to the roots.
> 
> Boud,
> We yet have to know what it means to get back to the roots...

First define what the problem is -- i.e., what the user wants to do when he starts an \
application. That's the first question to answer. 


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]