[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: How unstable is busybox "unstable"?
From:       Tim Tassonis <stuff () decentral ! ch>
Date:       2020-07-20 14:21:55
Message-ID: c06ea60d-b700-c7cb-c22f-4b3431ad5a16 () decentral ! ch
[Download RAW message or body]



On 7/19/20 9:03 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:53 PM Tim Tassonis <stuff@decentral.ch> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I just saw that busybox 1.32.0 is out, including the find "-empty"
>> extension by Aaro Koskinen, which is a really great addition for me, in
>> order to remove deeply-nested directory structures, when empty (kernel
>> modules directory with no manual additions).
>>
>> I currently carry Aaro's patch on 1.31.1, but of course would not mind
>> going with the newest release. Are there any known regressions or
>> showstoppers for 1.32.0?
> 
> It's subjective.
> Statistically, .0 version is more buggy than .1, .1 is more buggy than .2 etc
> 
> If you go and use a .0 release, you might be one of the people who help
> make .1 more stable! ;) ;)

Good point, I'll upgrade, then!


Bye
Tim
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]