[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: rustybox, an experimental fork written entirely in Rust
From:       Harald van Dijk <harald () gigawatt ! nl>
Date:       2019-11-17 10:40:42
Message-ID: eb1fecc8-0d6a-b85a-7f20-d6fb76a125f7 () gigawatt ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

On 16/11/2019 12:01, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> 
>    The busybox mailing-list has managed, for the most part, to stay clear
> of language flamewars during all these years.

FWIW, I considered the message to which I responded, that I disagreed 
with, entirely reasonable. It stated goals for busybox and attempted to 
explain with facts how a Rust-based implementation cannot meet those 
goals, just like you did in the rest of your message. Some of the stated 
facts were, I believe, inaccurate, hence my reply to address those. 
Neither of those messages was a flame, and I am interested in what Eli 
Schwartz's response is, if he chooses to send one.

Cheers,
Harald van Dijk
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]