[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re:[PATCH v1] Size reduction, cleanup, fixes, improvements for swapon/swapoff
From:       Tito <farmatito () tiscali ! it>
Date:       2014-03-31 20:18:07
Message-ID: 201403312218.07275.farmatito () tiscali ! it
[Download RAW message or body]

>>* Tito <farmatito at tiscali.it> [31.03.2014 09:53]:
>> So now swapoff first cycles through  /proc/swaps and then through fstab
>> to swapoff all devices. 
>
>Does it make sense to "swapoff" devices which are not known via /proc/swaps?
>Or is it just if /proc is missing?
>
>nevertheless: thanks for submission! bye, bastian

Sorry Bastian but your mail somehow didn't get through to my mail client.

Real swapoff does more or less the same: first /proc/swaps and then
/etc/fstab. Doing both without further error checking maybe adds a little
overhead but reduces code needed.

Ciao,
Tito
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]