[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    RE: ash Posix standards
From:       Pietro Paolini <P.Paolini () Genexis ! eu>
Date:       2014-03-24 14:07:55
Message-ID: 763E0329A3CFAB40BE4461291D3A7ED326F32D48 () GENEHEX01 ! genexislocal ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 09:07:27AM +0000, Pietro Paolini wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I really would like have a reference for the ash shell provided in the busybox \
> package, reading the README inside the shell/ folder I can see :
> 
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
> Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7
> 
> 
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap01.html
> Shell & Utilities
> 
> [..]
> 
> 
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
> [..]
> 
> Is then ash compliant to those ?

> It's intended to be, as long as CONFIG_ASH_BASH_COMPAT is not selected
> at build time. Turning on that option alters the shell grammar to be
> non-conforming to POSIX. In particular, &> gets interpreted as one
> token instead of two.

> Rich


Thanks for your answer, do you think the best way I could take to have the details \
about this options is to dig into the source code or does a doc exit for that ?

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]