[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: Versioning rationale in BusyBox
From:       Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2014-02-20 22:22:34
Message-ID: CAK1hOcM9DT3NOm0a7QdAPAFCajdrsS6vZRmxEw7jGOuv5_4SPQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Leonardo Passos <lnrdpss@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder how the versioning numbers of BusyBox, as kept by the tags in git,
> work.
> Are tags ended in 0 unstable, and others stable?

Common sense says that .0 releases of most software are less stable than .1,
which are, in turn, less stable than .2, and so on.

I call .0 releases of busybox "unstable", but it's a matter of definition.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]