[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: httpd w/PHP performance
From:       Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2012-06-22 11:52:11
Message-ID: CAK1hOcPwPnD3fV8Xo7NrC6mzDGZcYMbZB5ut+q--+a-QVhHBQw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch
<bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> wrote:
>> embedded environment. By comparison, lighttpd starts a programmable number
>> of php-cgi processes at startup, then keeps them around and just feeds
>> scripts to them as needed. It is feasible to go back to lighttpd but before
>
> This is (very probably) fast-cgi so no one wonders that it's vastly
> faster.
> Use pure CGI with lighttpd for a serious comparison.
>
>> giving up for this reason, I wanted to ask if my understanding or build of
>> the httpd is incorrect in some way. Any thoughts, suggestions, comments ?
>
> Perhaps implementing fast-cgi into busybox-httpd is a solution.
> But I've seen lighttpd on embedded sysrtems and it's not that fat (if
> you leave out everything you do not need).

I looked into fastcgi spec here: http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/6?q=node/22

It is not exactly too simple.

It is possible to implement it, but it
can't be done as just a quick hack. :(

-- 
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]