[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: busybox
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lsof.c: a very simple lsof implementation
From: Tito <farmatito () tiscali ! it>
Date: 2012-03-21 8:08:00
Message-ID: 201203210908.00334.farmatito () tiscali ! it
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 22:30:20 Sven Oliver Moll wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I did a complete rework on my lsof implementation, focusing on robustness,
> memory consumption and lowering the calls of malloc()/free().
>
> Trying to use recurive_action() didn't work out as expected, the action
> handlers added more code than the removal of the simple
> opendir()/readdir()-loop would have saved.
>
> Now as a patch for integration into busybox-1.19.4. I hope this is of any
> use to you.
>
>
> Greetings,
> SvOlli
>
Hi,
maybe you can simplify it by using thefunctions in libbb/procps.c.
Just an idea, untested.
Ciao,
Tito
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic