[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: ls and human readable format
From:       Harald Becker <ralda () gmx ! de>
Date:       2011-02-28 23:33:35
Message-ID: 4D6C30CF.4020201 () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

 Hi!

>> But not only Busybox fails with this, the ls from coreutils (Version
>> 8.10) fails at the size in blocks option too. Can anybody verify this?
>> Does anybody have contact to the coreutils guys and can report this

> I report issue to coreutils when I find them.
> What fail with coreutils-8.10 ls?
May be it was my mistake and an alias definition stepped in ...
toothache + kernel oops trouble + sudden power drop at the same weekend,
was really awesome.

> It look to work for me (x86 32bits) with ls -sh
Can you please try "ls -sl" and "ls -slh" and look if those get right.
My tooth has just been extracted and I'm currently not really fit.

--
Harald
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]