[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    What was bug 1604?
From:       Rob Landley <rob () landley ! net>
Date:       2010-10-31 6:12:49
Message-ID: 201010310112.49736.rob () landley ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

The current bugzilla database hasn't got a 1604, and I dunno where mantis is 
archived.

Busybox umount was damaged by commit b2e578a1f2c3cf317 which made umount leak 
/dev/loopX entries by default, but didn't stop umount from auto-allocating the 
suckers.  So busybox mount/umount are now incoherent.  Wheee...

I have no idea what the rationale for this change was.

By the way, any time you say "non-standard", reference which standard.  The 
mount and umount commands aren't in SUSv4.  BSD used vnconfig, slowaris used 
lofi, macosx does something vaguely like FUSE...

Rob
-- 
GPLv3: as worthy a successor as The Phantom Menace, as timely as Duke Nukem 
Forever, and as welcome as New Coke.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]