[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: Sed bug.
From:       Rob Landley <rob () landley ! net>
Date:       2010-05-12 5:26:03
Message-ID: 201005120026.04147.rob () landley ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 11 May 2010 18:47:44 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 06:38, Rob Landley wrote:
> > echo -e '\t| one \\\n\t| two \\\n' | sed -e '/| one /a \
> >
> >         | three \\' -e '/| one-/a \
> >         | three-* \\'
> >
> > The above behaves differently on busybox and gnu seds.
> >
> > I've meant to fix it all weekend, but was too busy.  Just thought I'd
> > post it here so it wouldn't get lost...
>
> Please try attached patch.

Yay, it works!

Thanks,

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]