[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 34/39] Makefile: support building executable with extension
From:       Rob Landley <rob () landley ! net>
Date:       2010-04-18 6:29:17
Message-ID: 201004180129.18134.rob () landley ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 15 April 2010 15:02:19 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Makefile        |   15 ++++++++-------
>  Makefile.custom |   22 +++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

I remember one of the big things that attracted me to BusyBox in the first 
place was its simplicity.  That we knew what it was we _didn't_ do, and didn't 
have to deal with the FSF bloatware of having code for ".exe" and such 
everywhere, or libtool...

I miss those days...

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]