[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Allow device nodes to be omitted with -
From:       Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-03-31 17:39:09
Message-ID: 20100331173909.GB667 () mx ! loc
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:49:04AM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
>Ping. Any interest in this patch?

sounds good to me.
Denys?

>
>On 22/03/2010, at 7:46 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
>> 
>> On 22/03/2010, at 7:49 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:15:11AM +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>>> This patch allows mdev to omit creation of device nodes
>>> 
>>> I'd go for '!' and your doc hunk lacks '"prevent" creation' or "omit".
>>> 
>> 
>> '!' probably makes slightly more sense.
>> How's this (with docs made clearer too)?
>> 
>
>--
>µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/
>WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd
>W: www.workware.net.au      P: 0434 921 300
>E: steveb@workware.net.au   F: 07 3102 9221
>
>
>


>_______________________________________________
>busybox mailing list
>busybox@busybox.net
>http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]