[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       busybox
Subject:    Re: utimes() does not work?
From:       Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2009-12-02 11:33:52
Message-ID: 200912021233.52414.vda.linux () googlemail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 21:23, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Yes, it takes [2], I'm sorry :(

Why utimes() are better in the case when we do not set subsecond
resolution [am]times? For compat reasons, utime() will still
be available or a long time, why we shouldn't use it?
Using utimes() instead of utime() results in bigger code.
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]